|
jiggyman195 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i agree amerika
hora09sasu (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
stupid ameriKans, they tell you to buy a stupid truck good for nothing if you compare it with any other car made in europe, evribody hate you amerika!
squantos42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
that is because they are two completely different things. Weight / Size / Materials will not be exactly to scale.
coreAtheist (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
What an ironic comment.
reoch999 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So if I throw a hot wheels car at a brick wall at 60 mph (a fairly conservative speed for a full size automobile) it won't be damaged very much? Hmm, someone please try this and post the video response.
BlueBoiiChickenFace (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hahahahayea smarty pants u cant count 4 shit lol
carpenterb12 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
you missed 4...
menorche (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Fact #3. More people die in side impact crashes than in frontal or rear crashes. If you are in a heavy vehicle and get hit by an equally heavy vehicle, not only does the impact have to STOP the car hitting you, but it also has to START moving your car. His comment of "you'll be safer in a prius" does not apply for a side impact, where the higher mass of the prius works to the disadvantage to the passanger.Fact #5. The smaller the frame, the higher the structural integrity. IE: hotwheels.
menorche (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wow... A *LOT* of you commenters *NEED* to take a basic physics class to see that SMART is safer than it seems. Fact #1. It is not the G force of the car that is in question, but the total G force experienced by the PASSENGERS. Look up 5th gear's "volvo vs Peugot" and see how the smaller Peugot uses the Volvo's crumple zone to it's advantage.Fact #2. The smaller the vehicle, the stronger the frame. That's why heavy vehicles are death traps during side-impacts.
andrezor24 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i hate this fucking little bumper car... |
